{"id":4090,"date":"2025-09-12T17:26:07","date_gmt":"2025-09-12T14:26:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/?p=4090"},"modified":"2025-10-04T11:17:47","modified_gmt":"2025-10-04T08:17:47","slug":"beyond-truth-and-falsehood","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/beyond-truth-and-falsehood\/","title":{"rendered":"Beyond Truth and Falsehood"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

My colleague and advisor Dr. Alexander Laszlo<\/a> first came into my life a few years ago, when I approached him on LinkedIn<\/a> about our \u201cwisdom-mining<\/a>\u201d initiative. He listened patiently, connected us with many inspiring academics, and has continued to share ideas and opportunities that shape our work. Most recently, he drew my attention to a special issue of the Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics<\/a><\/em> dedicated to Prof. Florentin Smarandache<\/a>\u2019s work on Neutrosophy<\/a> \u2014 a branch of mathematics that explores the labyrinths between Truth and Falsehood. Literally meaning \u201cneutral philosophy,\u201d Neutrosophy examines what lies between polar extremes such as \u201cgood\u201d and \u201cbad,\u201d emphasising that these neutral states often carry the greatest significance precisely because their value is still indeterminate. Discovering this field has been an eye-opener for me. It offers a natural complement to structured dialectics, enriching our ability to describe psychological and social nuances. Dr. Laszlo\u2019s own interest in syntony<\/a> \u2014 a pathway to sustainable prosperity \u2014 resonates strongly with both Neutrosophy and dialectics. Together these perspectives quickly led to the manuscript below, which we are now considering for submission to the above-mentioned issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Below are two manuscripts: first is short (3 pages only), oriented for mathemathicians, second is longer (9 pages) for philosophers and psychologists<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Short:<\/p>\n\n\n\n