{"id":592,"date":"2022-08-24T17:39:00","date_gmt":"2022-08-24T14:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/?p=592"},"modified":"2023-12-08T09:17:11","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T07:17:11","slug":"character-traits-from-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/character-traits-from-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Character Traits from Words"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Every word can be related to character traits, like in the latest Atlas version<\/a> (see the cells\u2019 coordinates with the letters and Simpson’s faces on the margins). It is similar to how every English word has been earlier related to the Valence-Arousal-Dominance scales, and Plutchik’s emotion indices (see e.g<\/em>., NRC VAD<\/a> and Emotion Lexicons<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These traits (letters with Simpson’s faces) are further related to the Myers-Briggs and Enneagram’s psycho-types (see the scheme Who Am I?<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In other words, every tagged information can be assigned with personality type(s), as if it was a \u201clive human being\u201d. Note that even a single word can yield a psycho-type, thanks to its linking not only to MBTI, but also to Enneagram.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, the word Control is assigned with J (T) from 11(g), indicating Judgement (1 point) and Thinking (0.5 point). This yields one preferred enneagram type (Perfectionist ~ Judgement), one \u201csupplementary\u201d type (Challenger ~ Thinking), and 4 Meyers-Briggs types (ISTJ \u2013 Logistician, ESTJ \u2013 Executive, INTJ \u2013 Architect, ENTJ \u2013 Commander)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The word Faith is assigned with five letters \u2013 S, I, F from 11(a) and N, E from 13(d). This yields one preferred enneagram type (Helper ~ Feeling), as all other types form \u201cbalanced dichotomies\u201d (Investigator ~ Introvert is balanced by Achiever ~ Extrovert, and Loyalist ~ Sensing is balanced by Individualist ~ Intuition). It also yields eight MBTI types (all containing F \u2013 ISFJ, ESFJ, INFJ, ENFJ, ISFT, ESFT, INFT, ENFT)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Front window could display only the major type, whereas \u201csecondary\u201d window could show the rest<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Higher number of words gives the more accurate \/ detailed psycho-types, thanks to the larger statistical sampling. For instance, the most important words of Forrest Gump yield:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Faith (11a, 13d) \u2013 S, I, F, N, E
Devotion (7d, 11a) \u2013 S, I, F, T, (E)
Sincerity (3b, 3c) \u2013 S, I, P, Tu, (P, N)
Peculiarity (3f) \u2013 Tu, (N)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This gives the following stats: I3<\/sub>, S3<\/sub>, N2<\/sub>, F2<\/sub>, Tu2<\/sub>, E1.5<\/sub>, P1.5<\/sub>, T1<\/sub>, J0<\/sub>, A0<\/sub>, with the following Enneagram\u2019s weights (in parentheses):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Achiever (3.5) = Tu2<\/sub> + E1.5<\/sub>
Loyalist (3) = S3<\/sub>
Investigator (3) = I3<\/sub>
Individualist (2) = N2<\/sub>
Helper (2) = F2<\/sub>
Enthusiast (1.5) = P1.5<\/sub><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Consider dichotomies: I3<\/sub> \u2013 E1.5<\/sub>, S3<\/sub> \u2013 N2<\/sub>, F2<\/sub> \u2013 T1<\/sub>, P1.5<\/sub> \u2013 J0<\/sub>, Tu2<\/sub> \u2013 A0<\/sub>. This yields the following \u201cstrengths\u201d:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Investigator (3 vs<\/em>. 1.5) = I3<\/sub> \u2013 E1.5<\/sub>;
Loyalist (3 vs.<\/em> 2) = S3<\/sub> \u2013 N2<\/sub>,
Helper (2 vs.<\/em> 1) = F2<\/sub> \u2013 T1<\/sub>,
Achiever (2 vs.<\/em> 0) = Tu2<\/sub> \u2013 A0<\/sub>,
Enthusiast (1.5 vs.<\/em> 0) = P1.5<\/sub> \u2013 J0<\/sub>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This also means that the letters I, S, F, Tu, P are the most important, suggesting the MBTI type ISFP-Tu \u2013 \u201cturbulent adventurer: flexible, charming, flighty\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Adding the \u201caverage-weighted\u201d words with the \u201chigh\/average\u201d ratio 3\/2 yields the same rankings with different coefficients (I3.3<\/sub> \u2013 E1.8<\/sub>, Tu3.3<\/sub> \u2013 A0.6<\/sub>, S3.3<\/sub> \u2013 N3<\/sub>, P2.8<\/sub> \u2013 J0<\/sub>, F2<\/sub> \u2013 T1<\/sub>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

See also:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Global Wisdom Network<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Heraclitus 24 Update<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Information Tagging<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Every word can be related to character traits, like in the latest Atlas version (see the cells\u2019 coordinates with the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[27,22,23],"class_list":["post-592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-analysis","tag-character-traits","tag-self-analysis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=592"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":981,"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/592\/revisions\/981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dialexity.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}